Jumat, 07 Januari 2011

Inclusion Versus Spealized Education

As understood, the needs of students with specific learning disabilities, for example, need to be properly assessed & placed in a separate surroundings where they can function simultaneously as the same group of individuals who have the same SpLD profile as themselves. This can only be achieved is students are learning from special ed schools & not within a more unequal surroundings in an inclusive system.

Schooling has been the priority of all government bodies throughout the world. Even the United Nations has declared an "agenda what is being advanced in particular by international agencies such as the UNESCO, the World Bank, & the UK's Department for International Development" (Armstrong, Spandagou, & Armstrong, 2009). Finally, the issue of inclusion has been more of a general debate about schooling in which the fate of students with special needs is indirectly affected in as far as the proper educational setting is concerned.

It can be expected that normal students would tend to excel as compared to students with special needs because they are more advanced in terms of learning abilities. This would lead to a psychological effect to the student with SpLD as they or they would feel that they or they are going to be left out from the pace of learning. As such, this can generate a stressful scenario where various changes in terms of behavior & cognitive reactions can be expected from the student. This is where the disadvantages of inclusion come in.

Inclusion is fundamentally being promoted as a kind of reducing inequalities or discrimination among individuals. It is being promoted by most developed nations & is a struggle among developing nations where schooling is not affordable. As such, inclusion is a vague issue in as far as the abilities of students are concerned. It creates a difficult scenario for both regular & students with special needs because learning abilities differ from another. Say for example a special ed school would include both regular & students with SpLD in class.

As said in the article of Derrick Armstrong, Ilektra Spandagou, & Ann Cheryl Armstrong entitled "One Nation Globalization & Inclusive Education", they discussed that "inclusive schooling as a late modernity reform project is exemplified in the demand 'education for all' despite of the simplicity of its message & that such is highly contestable... its effectiveness is closely related to managing students by minimizing disruption in regular classrooms & by regulating failure within schooling systems" (2009). With this in mind, inclusion can be more harmful for both students with special needs & regular students because inequality of attention & teaching approach would not be tailored fit based on their abilities to learn & succeed.

On this basis, inclusion would not be relevant despite of the economic conditions present within a positive society. It is the responsibility of individual governments to allocate specific programs & financial aid to provide special ed schools to students with special needs that can work besides a separate program for students with special needs. Different programs or approaches must be implemented than merge different fields of expertise together because could not excel if the other have the advantage of a faster learning ability or a more active physical skills. As such, inclusion must be avoided in as far as special schooling are concerned because only within special ed schools can students with special needs would be given focus so that they can generate properly amidst the pace that they can accomplish in the learning system.

Tidak ada komentar:

Poskan Komentar